Difficult to explain what is acquired through experience
Difficult to explain what is acquired through experience
Difficult to explain what is acquired through experienceGPT.icon
Can't a term coined based on an experience that can't be shared be explained when asked to define or explain its meaning?/villagepump/nishio.icon
It's a case of "concepts being created by giving names to what is experienced," and those concepts are defined by experience.
If this experience is not something that can be easily shared, it is impossible to convey the definition of the concept
Examples of easy sharing
Show them an apple and a tomato and say, "They're both red."
Examples not easily shared
A concept found in the differences between each of the three children I raised.
Difficult to communicate to someone who maybe has no experience in parenting, I don't know.
Trouble is, it's hard for "those who've been there" to feel "those who haven't" from now on.
Often perceive as "natural" what they have acquired through experience
I guess I can at least understand how that could happen./villagepump/inajob.icon
I'm not sure if that's called understanding, but it doesn't sound like it can't be explained.
Even if it is not possible to use
I see. Most recently.Instacode の良さ、みたいなのを説明するのが難しいという話かな/villagepump/inajob.icon Parallel Diary" is obviously a coined term./villagepump/nishio.icon
Can you explain this to someone who has not had the "experience of multiple people writing journals on Scrapbox"?
Depends on the depth of the explanation?/villagepump/inajob.icon
I feel I can explain the situation.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/経験によって獲得したものを説明することは困難 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.